[The defendant is charged [in Count ] with ___________<insert underlying crime>.] The defendant is [also] charged [in Count ] with murder. A person can be guilty of murder under the provocative act doctrine even if someone else did the actual killing.

To prove that the defendant is guilty of murder under the provocative act doctrine, the People must prove that:

1.      The defendant was an accomplice of________________ <insert
name[s] or description[s] of alleged provocateur[s]> in (committing/ [or] attempting to commit)                                                                                           
<insert underlying crime>

2.      In (committing/ [or] attempting to commit)______________

<insert underlying crime>, <insert name[s] or description[s] of alleged provocateur[s]> intentionally did a provocative act;

3.   ___________________ <insert name[s] or description[s] of alleged
provocateur[s]> knew that the natural and probable consequences of the provocative act were dangerous to human life and then acted with conscious disregard for life;

4.      In response to    ’s <insert name[s] or
description[s] of alleged provocateur[s]> provocative act,
                      <insert name or description of third party>

killed_______________ <insert name of decedent>;

AND

5.                             ’s <insert name of decedent> death was the

natural and probable consequence of_____________ ’s <insert
name[s] or description[s] of alleged provocateur[s]> provocative act.

A provocative act is an act:

1. [That goes beyond what is necessary to accomplish the
____________ <insert underlying crime>;]

[AND

       2.] Whose natural and probable consequences are dangerous to